|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-sc hema)
- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>, xml-dev@l...
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 12:33:40 -0400
Len,
> Sure, but one can come up with different ways to
> do that, and reapplication of XLinks is possible.
> It isn't that RDDL isn't important given enough
> acceptance, it simply isn't core, meaning, XML
> application languages build off of it in the
> same way they would with XLink, XInclude, and
> so on. XML systems can build off it and I'm
> sure many will.
>
It is namespaces that are the core part of XML. RDDL provides people and
software a reasonable way to find out about and use namespace related
information.
It turns out that an XHTML document is a great way for people to find out
about a namespace, and XLink allows software to discover similar
information.
-Jonathan
|
Purchase Stylus Studio Online Today!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
 |
| Atom 0.3 |
 |
| |
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|
Cart
