• From: Jun Fujisawa <fujisawa@t...>
• To: sam th <sam@u...>
• Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:49:57 +0900

At 12:51 PM -0500 00.7.6, sam th wrote:
> > My suggestion on this matter would be to Base64 encode the data.  This
> > increases the size, but Base64 does not use any illegal characters.
>
>In AbiWord, this is the approach we use (we have an XML file format).  our
>stuff looks like so:
>
><data>
><d name="pic1">
>base64encodedstuffgoeshere
></d>
></data>

The 'data' URL scheme described in RFC2397 might be a better choice.
It also uses base64 encoding but has an advantage that we can use unified
syntax to reference both linked and embedded images.

<http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2397.txt>


--
Jun Fujisawa
<mailto:fujisawa@t...>

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: image in XML file
    • From: sam th <sam@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C XML Schema Questionaire
• Next by Date: Re: XML across varied Servers
• Previous by thread: RE: image in XML file
• Next by thread: validating parser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread