[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)

• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>, "David Brownell" <david-b@p...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 20:06:40 -0500

Hi Tim,

Tim said:
On top of which, if you combine XML & CSS you seem to lose access to
the DOM. And why would I bother sending XML to a browser if I
didn't plan to do something other than display it once it got there;
and how can I do anything if the DOM isn't there?  Case closed.

If anyone has actually managed to get the DOM working in the
XML+CSS environment, please let us know how. -Tim

Didier replies:
With the behavior draft we can do that if a CSS?? (3 maybe) includes a
@script construct. In this case a full access to the DOM is feasible and
thus it provides user interaction processing in addition to rendition.

Ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/becss

Cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@n...
Conferences: Web New York (http://www.mfweb.com)
Book to come soon: XML Pro published by Wrox Press
Products: http://www.netfolder.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: re: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Next by Date: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Previous by thread: Re: Geoworks and their patent
• Next by thread: FW: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread