[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)

• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 20:26:56 -0500

Hi Simon,

Simon said:
That plus support for simple XLinks is about the minimum needed for
building Web sites.  IE 5.0 will let you read XML+CSS; it won't let you
surf it.

(I could try its bizarrely broken html: pseudo-namespace, but let's not
even go there.)

Didier replies:
If we have the "link" property and the "@style" construct + EcmaScript we
have about everything needed to implement two kind of links:
a) simple links = object with "link" property
b) extended links = objects with attached behavior.

For extended links I already experimented with an EcmaScript behavior that
displays a menu in which all the links are displayed as menu options. Thus,
if you include an xlink:extended link in the document, this element is
associated to a behavior with a selector that match to either the
"xlink:extended" element or an other selector that matches to the attribute
"xlink:type="extended". the behavior uses the DOM to construct the context
menu from all the locators included in the extended link.

So, what is then required for an Xlink support is:
a) the link property
b) a behavior for the xlink:extended construct
c) and off course the behavior and @script constructs added to CSS.

ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/becss

If fact the behavior construct allows to create modular browser by adding
new functionalities in a standard way if the scripts are written in
EcmaScript and that they use strictly compliant DOMs.

Cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@n...
Conferences: Web New York (http://www.mfweb.com)
Book to come soon: XML Pro published by Wrox Press
Products: http://www.netfolder.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Geoworks and their patent
    • From: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>

• References:
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Next by Date: Geoworks and their patent
• Previous by thread: Re: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Next by thread: Geoworks and their patent
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread