[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Costs of the W3C

• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>,"xml-dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 15:25:37 -0500

At 03:01 PM 1/17/00 -0500, David Megginson wrote:

>Can a company like that reasonably devote 20% of one of the senior
>engineers' time to a W3C WG?  Maybe, if the engineer made it a
>condition of employment or if the WG's work were critical to the
>company's success or failure, but I doubt that either is the typical
>case.

Probably not, but participation can also give them a competitive edge,
contacts, and a variety of other goodwill that is difficult to quantify in
terms of dollars ROI. 


>That said, I think that Ann and I probably agree that the real cost of
>W3C work or any othe standards work is not the $5K fee but the human
>time that a company has to invest.

Yes 

(though I wouldn't make toooo many assumptions about my staff costs :) )

Ann
---
Just Released! - HTML BY Example
Now shipping -  Mastering XML 
Also in print:  Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education             http://www.hwg.org/services/classes





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: Costs of the W3C
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • RE: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Costs of the W3C
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Simple XML conformance
• Next by Date: XML and java
• Previous by thread: Re: Costs of the W3C
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread