[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article

• From: Robert La Quey <robertl1@h...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 17:18:37 -0800

At 01:42 PM 1/15/00 -0800, you wrote:
>At 01:58 PM 1/15/00 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> >As much as I appreciate that the W3C is busy, getting this out a lot
> >earlier would have been useful, to say the least.  A lot of the dates on
> >these are _very_ old.
>
>Mea culpa, more than anyone else.  But it's a symptom of the W3C's 
>#1 problem, lack of resources.  I've been busy helping get XLink done.
>CMSMCQ's been busy helping get schema done.  JeanPa's been busy getting
>MS Office to do something sensible with XML, a little bird tells me.  It
>was tough to lay any of these tasks aside to put in the errata work.

Well, open up the game and you will get a lot more resources.  Not 
money, but the scarce resource, brains and imagination. 

I don't see Linus complaining about a lack of resource for Linux. 

Some people might have to give up some control though. But again I don't see
Linus asking for permission to axe stuff he does not like. 

Forward,


Bob La Quey


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w...>
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Simple XML conformance
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Previous by thread: Re: Costs of the W3C
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread