[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: an unfilled need

• From: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w...>
• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>, <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 17:47:25 -0400

>> Rick Jelliffe:
>>>There is no W3C method to declare which schema should be
>>>used, akin to the stylesheet declaration.
>
>> Yes there is: resolution of the schema URI.
>
>Tim is saying that using the namespace URI to specify a schema
>is the official W3C method. But there is nothing about this in
>any W3C spec; no working group has decided this or put it out
>in a public draft or spec.


Clearly there is a lack of public guide to W3C architecture and plans.
I admint, a lot of these are discussed at eht AC meting.  We do have
activity statements (linked from http://www.w3.org/ by two clicks) but they
may have too high a granularity.  I have my own notes about architecture
at http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/ the top level of which,
http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecure is still a note but has had
a lot of discussion for example in the chairs group.

I haven't investigated this case just now as regards where all the documents
are, but the RDF work certianly assumed that the
namespace URIs point to schemas and that is clear even from the RDF Rec.


Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: groves dissent
• Next by Date: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Previous by thread: Re: an unfilled need
• Next by thread: the necessary software infrastructure for open collaborative bodies
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread