[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: an unfilled need

• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 18:15:00 +0800

From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@s...>

>... Using this technique you can
>decouple the model language used for the message from any model
associated
>with the semantics. This means that it does not matter how the
semantics
>have been defined (XML-Data, RDF, text, etc) you can still use a DTD or
a
>Schema to model your message. To me this gets over the problems that
would
>arise if W3C tried to define formal mechanisms for the linking of
namespace
>URIs to schemas, etc.

To find the schema applicable for a namespace, we should not have
a function:
    fetch-resource(namespace-URI)

Instead, there it should go through some service:
    get-resource(namespace-URI, namespace-resolver-service-URI,
        preferred-syntax, resource-type)
where resource-type could be "syntactic-schema", "semantic-schema",
"documentation", etc.

Rick Jelliffe


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Another look at namespaces
• Next by Date: RE: Groves, IsNess and the Generic Data Object. [was.. Another try on Groves]
• Previous by thread: Re: an unfilled need
• Next by thread: Re: an unfilled need
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread