• From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 15:16:35 +0000

Marcus Carr wrote:
> 
> So... how do we get back to SGML people not having their eyes open?

Just for the record, I never said they were closed.  I believe it was
Chris Lilly.  And when he said this, he wasn't characterizing the en-
tire SGML community.  In fact, he was, overall, defending SGML.

-- 

Richard Goerwitz
PGP key fingerprint:    C1 3E F4 23 7C 33 51 8D  3B 88 53 57 56 0D 38 A0
For more info (mail, phone, fax no.):  finger richard@g...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: eyes open (was XML complexity, namespaces)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>

• References:
  • Re: who's on the XML WG?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: who's on the XML WG?
    • From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Richard Goerwitz <richard@g...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML complexity, namespaces
• Next by Date: RE: Parsing XML->DOM and XSL querying optimising
• Previous by thread: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Next by thread: Re: eyes open (was XML complexity, namespaces)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread