• From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>
• To: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:12:11 +0100

"Richard L. Goerwitz" wrote:
> 
> Marcus Carr wrote:
> >
> > So... how do we get back to SGML people not having their eyes open?
> 
> Just for the record, I never said they were closed.  I believe it was
> Chris Lilley. 

Yes.

> And when he said this, he wasn't characterizing the en-
> tire SGML community. 

Correct

> In fact, he was, overall, defending SGML.

Glad someone noticed. Its not something I do often ;-)

We now return to our regular programming.

--
Chris

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: who's on the XML WG?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: who's on the XML WG?
    • From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Richard Goerwitz <richard@g...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
  • Re: eyes open (was XML complexity, namespaces)
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>

• Prev by Date: XSA client kit released
• Next by Date: Oops! was Re: Transformation tool for windows
• Previous by thread: Re: eyes open (was XML complexity, namespaces)
• Next by thread: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread