• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 14:26:18 +1100

Lisa Rein wrote:
>>
>> yes the cloak and dagger stuff is amusing, isn't it. yet necessary.

I think there should be more secrecy, not less. Look at our impatience
at waiting 2 or more years for links, for example: the WGs are cruel
vixen toying with us.

Of course, pre-announcement helps keep up the buzz I suppose.  The RDF
spec is so good I think it should have been kept secret indefinitely.


Rick



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: who's on the XML WG?
    • From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: How to ??
• Next by Date: Re: How to ??
• Previous by thread: Re: who's on the XML WG?
• Next by thread: Re: who's on the XML WG?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread