• From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
• To: James.Anderson@m...
• Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 17:31:05 -0600

[James Anderson:]

> > ...  Namespaces (at least the bulk of their
> > syntax and the idea of identifying a namespace via a URI)
> > could also be used to do architectural forms.

> I've wondered about this.
> Wouldn't they, at least in their standardized form, be restricted to the
> limited fimaily of architectures which are mutually exclusive?

I don't [yet] see why.  What makes you think so?

-Steve

--
Steven R. Newcomb, President, TechnoTeacher, Inc.
srn@t...  http://www.techno.com  ftp.techno.com

voice: +1 972 231 4098 (at ISOGEN: +1 214 953 0004 x137)
fax    +1 972 994 0087 (at ISOGEN: +1 214 953 3152)

3615 Tanner Lane
Richardson, Texas 75082-2618 USA

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>

• References:
  • Re: who's on the XML WG?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: who's on the XML WG?
    • From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>

• Prev by Date: Save-To-XML
• Next by Date: Re: ModSAX: Proposed Core Features
• Previous by thread: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Next by thread: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread