• From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>
• To: "xml-dev@i..." <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:24:39 +0100

Steven R. Newcomb wrote:
> 
> ...  Namespaces (at least the bulk of their
> syntax and the idea of identifying a namespace via a URI)
> could also be used to do architectural forms.
> 

I've wondered about this.
Wouldn't they, at least in their standardized form, be restricted to the
limited fimaily of architectures which are mutually exclusive?


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>

• References:
  • Re: who's on the XML WG?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: who's on the XML WG?
    • From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Next by Date: About Tim's article on XML
• Previous by thread: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Next by thread: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread