[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XQuery/XPath 3.1: Node List to Node Set ("distinct

Subject: Re: XQuery/XPath 3.1: Node List to Node Set ("distinct nodes")
From: "Priscilla Walmsley pwalmsley@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:28:29 -0000
Re:  XQuery/XPath 3.1: Node List to Node Set ("distinct
Hi,

$nodes/. would re-order them in document order if that matters.

FunctX also has a distinct-nodes function but I doubt that it would be
considered obvious, and I also doubt that it would be as efficient as what you
came up with:

http://www.xqueryfunctions.com/xq/functx_distinct-nodes.html

Hope everyone is having a nice holiday.

Priscilla


From: Eliot Kimber eliot.kimber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 2:24 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  XQuery/XPath 3.1: Node List to Node Set ("distinct nodes")

Hmph.

That is certainly much more efficient p
 but is not necessarily obvious (at
least not to me).

Thanks!

E.
_____________________________________________
Eliot Kimber
Sr Staff Content Engineer
O: 512 554 9368
M: 512 554 9368
servicenow.com<https://www.servicenow.com>
LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/servicenow> |
Twitter<https://twitter.com/servicenow> |
YouTube<https://www.youtube.com/user/servicenowinc> |
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/servicenow>

From: Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx<mailto:martin.honnen@xxxxxx>
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxx
rytech.com>>
Date: Tuesday, December 28, 2021 at 1:15 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re:  XQuery/XPath 3.1: Node List to Node Set ("distinct nodes")
[External Email]


On 28.12.2021 20:10, Eliot Kimber
eliot.kimber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eliot.kimber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I couldnbt find an answer in my google and markmail searching so I
> thought Ibd ask here:
>
> Given an arbitrary list of nodes that may contain duplicates, what is
> the most efficient way to reduce the node list to a set?
>
> The solution I came up with is a recursive function:
>
> (:
>
> Get the unique nodes from the supplied sequence
>
> @param nodes The sequence of nodes to evaluate
>
> @return A sequence of nodes such that each node in $nodes exists exactly
> once.
>
> :)
>
> declare function dutils:distinctNodes($nodes as node()*) as node()* {
>
>    dutils:_getDistinctNodes($nodes, ())
>
> };
>
> declare function dutils:_getDistinctNodes($nodes as node()*, $resultList
> as node()*) as node()* {
>
>    if (exists($nodes))
>
>    then
>
>    let $node := head($nodes)
>
>    return dutils:_getDistinctNodes(tail($nodes), ($resultList | $node))
>
>    else $resultList
>
> };
>
> Which works but I feel like Ibm missing some obvious way to do this more
> directly, but Ibm not seeing it.
>
> Am I missing a better solution?

$nodes/.
XSL-List info and archive<http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list>
EasyUnsubscribe<http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/2716978> (by
email<>)

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.