[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Seek an XPath expression which concatenates an

Subject: Re: Re: Seek an XPath expression which concatenates an arbitrary number of strings
From: "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 16:23:42 -0000
Re:  Re: Seek an XPath expression which concatenates an
> Then, per the "composable language" capability I will embed that for-loop
inside the call to concat:
>
>   concat(for $i in //binary-value return $i)
>
>   But that doesn't work. Is XPath truly a composable language? If so, why
doesn't my XPath work?

This is because of how fn:concat is defined in XPath 3.1 (and
prior versions) - a call to it must specify at least 2 arguments, each with
cardinality of 1.

In XPath 4.0 this definition is extended and the following expression is
evaluated successfully:

   concat(for $i in 1 to 3 return $i)

and produces the expected result using BaseX v.11:

123

Thanks,
Dimitre

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 9:11b/AM Roger L Costello costello@xxxxxxxxx <
xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> Thank you for your replies. The string-join solution works fine.
>
> But, but, but,  ...
>
> Why doesn't my XPath work: concat(for $i in //binary-value return $i)
>
> I thought that I was simply employing XPath's "composable language"
> capability.
>
> The XPath specification says this:
>
>       XPath is a composable language
>
> What does that mean?
>
> It means that every operator and language construct allows any XPath
> expression to appear as its operand.
>
> So, what that means to me is that I can call the concat function:
>
> concat(...)
>
> and then inside the parentheses the entire XPath functionality is
> available to me. Right?
>
> Well, here is a fine XPath expression:
>
> for $i in //binary-value return $i
>
> Then, per the "composable language" capability I will embed that for-loop
> inside the call to concat:
>
> concat(for $i in //binary-value return $i)
>
> But that doesn't work. Is XPath truly a composable language? If so, why
> doesn't my XPath work?
>
> /Roger
>
>
>

--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they write
all patents, too? :)
-------------------------------------
Sanity is madness put to good use.
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.