[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

[no subject]

[no subject]
Which begs the question, how might the xsl-list archives be ...
declared / converted / made available (whatever) as training data?
  And for this set (minor drawback), how to extract the 'eventual'
solution from others proffered in error?

>
> I don't think there's any going back, so the chances of people creating code that won't run, that they can't debug themselves and which ChatGPT may not provide the correction required if prompted, is high.

And from your earlier comments, the more experience in writing xslt,
the more likely you'll arrive at a solution using AI?

>
> Michael, I wonder what "nasty accidents" you are thinking of -- some XSLTs used in particular industries with real-world safety issues? Maybe we can start to create some advice for clients on QA and testing protocols.
  Is it logical to say that chatGPT will be just as easy to trip up as
the man on the Clapham omnibus?

regards

ps. Tried google.bard with UK braille. Bit of a dogs breakfast.







-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.