[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] About casting
Good morning - at least in Europe ;-) Thank you Kay for bringing this up. For me it is not alway clear when I have to cast explicitly and when it is happening implicitly. I for my code cast explicitly even when it is not required. In this way I better understand what is happening. What you call strong casting is in my terminology explicit casting and your week casting is implicit casting for me. Have a wonderful week Always Leo > Just to clarify this, we could perhaps use the terms > > * strong casting - as performed using the "cast as" expression or a constructor function like xs:integer() > > * weak casting - as performed by the (badly-named) function conversion rules. Includes atomization, numeric promotion, and conversion of xs:untypedAtomic to the required type > > * exact match - the supplied value must match the required type exactly.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|