[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Count of template matches

Subject: Re: Count of template matches
From: "Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 13:58:29 -0000
Re:  Count of template matches
Michael:
I don't think that I overlooked using position() within template, as
triggered in the apply-templates mode. But as position() is
context-dependent, it will not return the same value as when applied within
a for-each over a summarily constructed sequence of nodes. The requirement
is (cf. that other thread started yesterday) to enumerate certain nodes
across the entire document.

-W

On 4 November 2014 12:49, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx <
xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Are you missing the fact that position() can be used during
> apply-templates processing, in the same way as during for-each processing?
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica
> mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> +44 (0) 118 946 5893
>
>
>
>
> On 4 Nov 2014, at 11:28, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx <
> xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A recent post has asked for a way to produce ordinals for the processing
> of a set of certain nodes.
>
> If you construct a sequence of the required nodes and iterate it (using
> for-each), position() yields the ordinals.
>
> If you use template/apply-templates. you can still determine the offset by
> calling index-of. But this has a catch, since index-of still requires the
> construction of the overall sequence using an XPath expression. But (and
> this is, for me, the catch) that the selection of the nodes that will
> eventually be processed depends on attribute values of template+@match
> and/or apply-templates+@select. This means that you need two ways to
> produce the same sequence of nodes for index-of to work. (I do know that
> XPath is powerful enough. so it's not an issue of not being able to - it's
> just duplicating an effort.)
>
> A function like fn:nth-time-around() in the context of a template would
> take care of the problem, which (apparently) isn't frequent enough to
> warrant such a function.
>
> Perhaps I'm simply ignorant of something?
> -W
>
>   XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list>
> EasyUnsubscribe <http://-list/293509> (by email)
>
>
>   XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list>
> EasyUnsubscribe <-list/528976> (by
> email <>)

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.