[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: except (was: Keys with duplicates should be simple

Subject: Re: except (was: Keys with duplicates should be simple)
From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:18:07 +0000
Re:  except (was: Keys with duplicates should be simple
If indeed except is equivalent to the set-theoretic difference
operator would it be beyond the pale to admit difference into the
syntax as a synonym for except.

Is it that different to the situation with || and concat?

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I don't want to have to read the spec to verify that except is in
>> fact a set difference operator so I'd just rather not use it.
>>
>
> I'm afraid that when people write code purely by trial and error, there's not much we can do to help them.
>
> We do try in the language design to avoid surprises, but we don't try to make it possible to write code by guessing the function names and operator symbols.
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.