Re: Preserving inline DTD

Play the video

Subject: Re: Preserving inline DTD
From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:28:34 +0000

On 28/01/14 14:41, Wendell Piez wrote:

An XSL-FO processor has no need for a DTD internal subset; indeed in
that architecture one would ordinarily consider one to be irregular
and superfluous if not worse.

Does this mean that an XPath statement in an XSL:FO script which references an attribute for which the internal subset provides a default value cannot make use of it? (My ignorance speaking: I have no use cases for FO here so I have barely ever used it.)

///Peter -- Peter Flynn | Electronic Publishing Unit | IT Services | University College Cork | Phone +353 21 490 2609 | Email pflynn@xxxxxx | Web www.ucc.ie

Current Thread

Re: Preserving inline DTD, (continued)
- David Carlisle - 27 Jan 2014 23:33:29 -0000
  - Martin Holmes - 27 Jan 2014 23:35:54 -0000
    - Graydon - 27 Jan 2014 23:56:10 -0000
    - Wendell Piez - 28 Jan 2014 14:41:15 -0000
    - Peter Flynn - 31 Jan 2014 12:28:49 -0000 <=
    - Wendell Piez - 31 Jan 2014 17:59:40 -0000
- Lizzi, Vincent - 28 Jan 2014 16:30:58 -0000
  - David Carlisle - 28 Jan 2014 16:53:14 -0000
  - Michael Kay - 28 Jan 2014 17:05:16 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Preserving inline DTD, Wendell Piez	Thread	Re: Preserving inline DTD, Wendell Piez
Re: Context node versus curre, Michael Kay	Date	Re: Re: [saxon] template matc, Wendell Piez
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >