[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Modes - Necessary Construct or Syntactic Sugar

Subject: Modes - Necessary Construct or Syntactic Sugar
From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:58:36 +0000
 Modes - Necessary Construct or Syntactic Sugar
Suppose there was a genuine use case for modes. By genuine I mean the
transform requires me to process the same nodes more than once and in
different ways.

Can I do this without using modes.

The first thing that comes to mind is creating an separate stylesheet
for the "2nd mode" and applying it's template rules via apply-imports.

The next thing that comes to mind is what if some of those rules want
to apply templates from the parent stylesheet. Well importing the
importer into the importee is not allowed but the rules don't seem to
prohibit including the importee.

So is this sufficient to dispense with modes from the subset of the
language I want to use.

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.