Re: Preserving CDATA sections?

Play the video

Subject: Re: Preserving CDATA sections?
From: Dan Vint <dvint@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:20:51 -0800

That's true, but I can be more cavalier with removing processing instructions. I could probably do that with the comments except there might be some useful info there. The PIs only are there because of the Arbortext Editor for the Editor.

..dan

At 04:41 PM 12/15/2012, David Carlisle wrote:

On 15/12/2012 17:06, Dan Vint wrote:
There is a node test for it so it should work like a comment without the
restriction of nested comments
No but with the restriction on nested PI's (you can't have the text ?> as a substring of the value of a PI) so they are not really much more flexible than comments, just changing the problem characters from -- to ?>.

David


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Danny Vint

Panoramic Photography
http://www.dvint.com

voice: 619-938-3610

Current Thread
Re: Preserving CDATA sections?, (continued) Michael Kay - 15 Dec 2012 07:44:06 -0000 Dan Vint - 15 Dec 2012 17:06:52 -0000 David Carlisle - 16 Dec 2012 00:41:40 -0000 Graydon - 16 Dec 2012 01:04:35 -0000 Dan Vint - 16 Dec 2012 01:21:03 -0000 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Preserving CDATA sections, Graydon	Thread	[XPath 3.0] Can anonymous fun, Costello, Roger L.
Re: Preserving CDATA sections, Graydon	Date	[XPath 3.0] Can anonymous fun, Costello, Roger L.
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >