Re: XPath that returns nothing

On 28 September 2011 11:14, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 28/09/2011 11:11, Andrew Welch wrote:
>>
>> ...so it's basically just making something explicit that is otherwise
>> implied?   I don't think I'd ever use it.
>
> not at all, if you don't force the default value with select="()" then the
> default is an empty _string_ so then

...but... only if you don't specify the as attribute - and you always
do that, right? :)


--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com