[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: problem with xsl:import and namespaces

Subject: Re: problem with xsl:import and namespaces
From: Jostein Austvik Jacobsen <josteinaj@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:44:32 +0200
Re:  problem with xsl:import and namespaces
Ah, ok. I guess I'll have to manually make sure that there aren't any
conflicts in the import tree then.

Thanks!
Jostein

2010/8/17 G. Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> At 2010-08-17 14:19 +0200, Jostein Austvik Jacobsen wrote:
>>
>> I've got five stylesheets, where test.xsl imports A.xsl and B.xsl,
>> A.xsl imports C1.xsl, and B.xsl imports C2.xsl. C1.xsl and C2.xsl is
>> in the same namespace, and defining the same function (i.e. C2.xsl is
>> a newer version of C1.xsl). Now, I wouldn't think that this would
>> cause a problem, as C1.xsl and C2.xsl is not imported directly into
>> the same stylesheet. test.xsl only makes use of C1.xsl and C2.xsl
>> indirectly via A.xsl and B.xsl, not knowing that there are multiple
>> versions of C (or that A.xsl and B.xsl uses C for that matter.)
>>
>> However, when importing B.xsl after A.xsl in test.xsl, then the
>> function in C1.xsl is overridden by the one in C2.xsl, even when
>> called from A.xsl...
>
> Yes, by definition. B There is only *one* collection of top-level names
when
> all of the importation and including is done.
>
>> I guess there's something I've missed about xsl:import and namespaces
>
> All top-level names can be qualified with a namespace URI.
>
> At the time of executing an instruction, there is a single set of names of
> top-level constructs. B Which top-level construct can be seen is based on
the
> instruction ... for example, <xsl:apply-templates/> will see one of every
> top-level construct name considering every tree in the import chain. B When
> using <xsl:apply-imports/> the instruction will see one of every top-level
> construct name considering every tree in only imported stylesheets and
their
> imports.
>
> You are using function calls and function calls are resolved across the
> entire importation tree, not just a subset. B So, the function call with
the
> highest importance in the entire tree is going to be the one that is always
> called.
>
> Latter imports in a stylesheet confer higher importance on imported
> stylesheet constructs than earlier imports. B In the spec this concept of
> importance is referred to officially as the "import precedence".
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> . . . . . . . . . . B Ken
>
> --
> XSLT/XQuery training: B  after http://XMLPrague.cz 2011-03-28/04-01
> Vote for your XML training: B  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/i/
> Crane Softwrights Ltd. B  B  B  B  B http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
> G. Ken Holman B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 B http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc
> Legal business disclaimers: B http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.