Re: Best way of testing Hexadecimal value [xslt 1.0]

in the code fragment I posted, I would propose the following change,

you may use:

<xsl:value-of select="false()" /> &
<xsl:value-of select="true()" />

instead of
<xsl:value-of select="'false'" />
<xsl:value-of select="'true'" />

This didn't struck me earlier :)

Regarding XSLT 2.0 vs 1.0, IMHO I would say the 2.0 version is much
better by design and increases programmer productivity considerably.

Here's a little anecdotal evidence:

I like this style of writing in 2.0

<xsl:variable name="x" select="fn:findSomething()" />

over

<xsl:variable name="x">
    <xsl:call-template name="findSomething" />
</xsl:variable>

in 1.0

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:31 AM,  <pankaj.c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yet another fine sample.
>
>>If you can, I encourage to move to a 2.0 environment (unless you are
>>programming for a browser) :)
>
> I personally always use and prefer 2.0 but for this particular case I've
> been asked to use 1.0. Some people still prefer old technologies over
> latest ones :-)
>
>
> Thanks anyway.
>
> Pankaj



-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi