[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: A question of style

Subject: Re: A question of style
From: dvint@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 12:46:51 -0700
Re:  A question of style
thanks, I don't beleive there are any prefix/namespace issues in this
application. there are no prefixes being generated or used

thanks


> At 2010-07-07 11:41 -0700, dvint@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>I just started working with some stylesheets developed by someone else
>> and
>>was surprised at some things I saw. They aren't wrong, it is a style
>> issue
>>I believe, but was wondering if there is any advantage or disadvantage to
>>this approach.
>>
>>I typically try to write as little code as possible. If I don't have to
>>use an XSLT element to do something, then why type all the extra code. So
>>I might do something like this:
>>
>><xsl:template match="foo"">
>>    <newelement att1="a" att2="b">Boilerplate text here</newelement>
>></xsl:template>
>>
>>what I came across today was much more verbose like this:
>>
>><xsl:template match="foo">
>>   <xsl:element anme="newelement">
>>      <xsl:attribute name="att1">a</xsl:attribute>
>>      <xsl:attribute name="att2">b</xsl:attribute>
>>      <xsl:text>boilerplate text here</xsl:text>
>>   </xsl:element>
>></xsl:template>
>>
>>Any comments on either approach?
>
> The second is agnostic to any namespaces declared in the stylesheet
> that have not been pruned using exclude-result-prefixes="".  The
> first will copy to the result tree all attached namespaces of the
> literal result element in the stylesheet, including those not pruned.
>
>>I'll use the xsl:element and xsl:text
>>constructs when I need to compute something or I'm trying to control the
>>formatting of text (use of whitespce), but those are real reasons for
>>using these constructs.
>
> Not if one uses exclude-result-prefixes="".
>
>>When the content is straight forward why would you go to all the extra
>> work?
>
> When you want to add only the element without any of its baggage it
> acquires as a literal result element in the stylesheet.
>
> I far prefer using exclude-result-prefixes="" and literal result
> elements than using the element instruction.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> . . . . . . . . . . .  Ken
>
>
>
> --
> XSLT/XQuery training:   after http://XMLPrague.cz 2011-03-28/04-01
> Vote for your XML training:   http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/i/
> Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
> G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc
> Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.