RE: XSLT vs javascript performance

When comparing the performance of a high-level language (XSLT) to a
lower-level language (Javascript), the first rule is that the ratio depends
more than anything else on the skill of the programmer writing in the
lower-level language. Unless you factor that as a variable into your
comparison, the results are fairly meaningless.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Belics [mailto:rob_belics@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 07 February 2010 21:38
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  XSLT vs javascript performance
> 
> I'm wondering if anyone has any information on performance of 
> xslt transformation speed in the browser vs letting 
> javascript work on the DOM from data fetched from the web. 
> For example, if the browser already has the xslt file or 
> javascript code and some xml data is fetched from a remote 
> server over the internet due to the user clicking on a link.
> Which could finish processing that data faster? 
> 
> After some Googling, I've only found one article that claims 
> xslt would be "many times faster" but without any reason for 
> saying that. Browsers, recently, have sped up performance of 
> their javascript engines quite a bit. Particularly Firefox, 
> Webkit and, now, Opera.