RE: most efficient escape quotes?

I would have though it was more intuitive to use replace(), and I would
expect it's also more efficient, but there's no way of knowing without
measuring it.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Koberg [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 10 February 2009 16:43
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  most efficient escape quotes?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> With XSL 1.0 and XPath 1.0 I had used recursion to escape quotes.  
> Using XPath 2.0, is the most efficient 'escape quotes' (\") the
> following:
> 
> <xsl:sequence select="string-join(tokenize(., '&quot;'), '\&quot;')"/>
> 
> Is there a more efficient (fastest, least memory) way?
> 
> thanks,
> -Rob