Re: xsl:function vs. xsl:template

I tend to use functions to return values, and named templates to add
nodes to the result tree... but sometimes just use a function anyway
because the calling code is less verbose.



2008/11/19 Felix Geller <fgeller@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi all,
>
>   how does the experienced XSLT 2.0 programmer decide on whether to
> use a xsl:function or a (named) xsl:template? Are any performance
> issues involved (the processor I'm using is Saxon)?
>
> When trying to comprehend a stylesheet, I find it easier if the
> control-flow is managed by explicit function calls.
> Using functions imposes the additional "burden" of passing the node to
> work on, when compared to xsl:call-template. However, passing the node
> brings the benefit of making the "context" explicit.
> Being able to use a function in XPath expression also offers a less
> verbose invocation of functionality.
>
> What are other benefits/shortcomings of either side? I haven't found
> any documentation on this issue but would appreciate any hints as to
> where to find some.
>
>
> cheers
>
> -- Felix
>
>



-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/