[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: LINQ to XML versus XSLT

Subject: Re: LINQ to XML versus XSLT
From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:53:33 +0100
Re:  LINQ to XML versus XSLT
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:26 PM
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE:  LINQ to XML versus XSLT

I guess that we all agree that the new LINQ to XML API is the
greatest thing to happen to XML for a very long time.

No, proprietary languages are bad, however good they are.


And procedural languages will always be worse than declarative languages for
a very large class of problems.


Perhaps I'm not being fair, there are millions of programmers out there
churning out zillions of lines of inefficient and unmaintanable DOM code,
and anything that improves their lives is to be welcomed. But they already
have the opportunity to do that, and to adopt approaches that are both much
more powerful and less proprietary.



Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/

True but in LINQ's defence it is declarative, in the same mould as SQL.


Joe
http://joe.fawcett.name


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.