[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: apply-templates vs. call-template problem
The overhead is mostly due to open source usage compliance issues. Overhead issues also include building, storing and executing java and libraries and classes on the source and target platforms. Plus legal stuff (which I know have been relaxed recently). I really like java, but, if I can get the job done without it that would be simpler, hence better. -g On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2008/6/16 Greg Fausak <lgfausak@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> 2008/6/16 Greg Fausak <lgfausak@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>> What's a good unix xslt processor? >>> >>> Saxon >>> >>> http://saxonica.com >>> >> >> I normally don't mess around with java based >> stuff unless there just isn't any other way. I've written >> my share of java code. The overhead with including a java >> app in a distribution is pretty high. But, it looks like >> in this xml/xslt world all roads lead to java/saxon :-) > > What is the overhead in including a java app in a distribution? > > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com > Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/ > > -- Greg Fausak greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|