RE: Efficiency: predicate vs function

Play the video

Subject: RE: Efficiency: predicate vs function
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:14:33 +0100

> For some anecdotal evidence, when I had this exact 
> requirement for the Sudoku Solver [1] and switched from 
> $seq[position() > 1] to subsequence($seq, 2) the performance 
> increase was significant.

I've run it with both variations and I'm seeing no significant difference at
all between the two cases.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread

Efficiency: predicate vs function
- Justin Johansson - 22 Jul 2007 20:01:32 -0000
  - Michael Kay - 22 Jul 2007 20:21:51 -0000
    - Andrew Welch - 23 Jul 2007 08:54:23 -0000
      - Michael Kay - 23 Jul 2007 09:44:04 -0000
      - Michael Kay - 25 Jul 2007 15:15:13 -0000 <=
      - Andrew Welch - 25 Jul 2007 15:42:58 -0000
      - Michael Kay - 25 Jul 2007 16:42:46 -0000
  - <Possible follow-ups>
  - Justin Johansson - 22 Jul 2007 20:02:52 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: Efficiency: predicate vs , Michael Kay	Thread	Re: Efficiency: predicate vs , Andrew Welch
Re: Using deep-equal() to mat, David Carlisle	Date	Re: Efficiency: predicate vs , Andrew Welch
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >