[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Shorthand.
Oh believe me nobody is more aware of the limitations of XSL 1.0 than I am. However, I'm not going to move my web application from Classic ASP to .NET to use Saxon (much as I despise 1.0). Yeah, my template works perfectly fine but I was just hoping for something more akin a 1.0 version of Angela's 2.0 solution, for pure style and type-ability reasons. If I could just magically go: <xsl:ajaxLink link='Click Me' href='process.asp' /> I'd be thrilled! I can't really use apply-templates (a la Grand Mr. Welch) because I'm not transforming links with XSL, I'm generating them. -S On 7/25/07, Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: One of the drawbacks of using XSLT 1.0 is its verbosity. If you are using this server side, you can replace your XSLT processor with an XSLT 2.0 compliant one (there's a .NET version of Saxon and Gestalt available, and a recent mail on this list revealed that the AltovaXML (free, contains xslt 2.0 compliant processor) can also be called from .NET apps).
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|