[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Alternative for current-group()
Have a follow-up question to replacing for-each-group with for-each using
muenchian grouping. - is there a way to do nested grouping using for-each
loops by this method? This is the nested loop I have (it is defined inside a
template):
<xsl:for-each-group select="//*[count(ancestor-or-self::*) = 3 group-by="@name"> <xsl:for-each-group select="current-group()/*" group-by="@name"> <xsl:value-of select="sum(current-group()/descendant::value)"/> As you will notice, I am using the first loop's current-group() in the second loop. I am basically trying to replace the second loop using for-each. I tried defining an equivalent xsl:key inside the first loop but then realized it's an error to define one inside a template. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Bhaskar
if you are using muenchian grouping, the analogue of current-group() is key()
<xsl:key name="k" match="/*/*/*" use="@name"/> <xsl:for-each select="/*/*/*[generate-id()=generate-id(key('k',@name))]"> <xsl:value-of select="sum(key('k',@name)/descendant::value)"/> David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ Best Shaadi proposals by email. Register now. http://ss1.richmedia.in/recurl.asp?pid=106
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|