RE: Grammars for XPath 2.0: which to use?

Play the video

Subject: RE: Grammars for XPath 2.0: which to use?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:05:41 +0100

> so these compound symbols appear as <cast as>

In the mail I sent, those angle brackets were chevrons. Sad that we're still
using software which only supports 7-bit characters in this day and age.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
Grammars for XPath 2.0: which to use? Dimitre Novatchev - 13 Jul 2007 04:12:30 -0000 Michael Kay - 13 Jul 2007 08:46:52 -0000 Michael Kay - 13 Jul 2007 09:06:02 -0000 <= Dimitre Novatchev - 13 Jul 2007 13:40:44 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: Grammars for XPath 2.0: w, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: Grammars for XPath 2.0: w, Dimitre Novatchev
Re: Clientside XSLT Transform, David Carlisle	Date	> replaced by ">", < is, Jethro Borsje
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >