Re: Saxon Transformation

Play the video

Subject: Re: Saxon Transformation
From: Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:22:31 +0100

jeb501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Which of the below method is best to use, Comparing its speed of
processing, effectiveness etc.,
java net.sf.saxon.Transform -o MyFile.html MyFile.xml MyFile.xsl

java -jar saxon.jar MyFile.xml MyFile.xsl > MyFile.htm

regardsEugene

Hi Eugene,

This seems like a Saxon-specific inquiry to me, which is best asked on the saxon user list. The two methods are a little different, but the speed you gain by specifying the start class is negligible compared to the time required to compile your stylesheet. The difference between redirecting stdout and letting Saxon write to stdout for you is, imho, zero.

If you want to gain speed when running multiple transformations, your best bet is to use the Saxon Java API. You can reuse your compiled stylesheet which will save a significant amount of time for each transformation.

Cheers,
-- Abel

Current Thread
Saxon Transformation jeb501 - 5 Mar 2007 05:52:46 -0000 Abel Braaksma - 5 Mar 2007 08:24:46 -0000 <= binu.idicula - 5 Mar 2007 09:04:48 -0000 Michael Kay - 5 Mar 2007 09:23:43 -0000 binu.idicula - 5 Mar 2007 09:57:10 -0000 Abel Braaksma - 5 Mar 2007 10:08:39 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Saxon Transformation, jeb501	Thread	Xsl:copy-of writes xmlns:xsi , binu.idicula
Saxon Transformation, jeb501	Date	Xsl:copy-of writes xmlns:xsi , binu.idicula
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >