[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Saxon Transformation
jeb501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Which of the below method is best to use, Comparing its speed of processing, effectiveness etc., Hi Eugene, This seems like a Saxon-specific inquiry to me, which is best asked on the saxon user list. The two methods are a little different, but the speed you gain by specifying the start class is negligible compared to the time required to compile your stylesheet. The difference between redirecting stdout and letting Saxon write to stdout for you is, imho, zero. If you want to gain speed when running multiple transformations, your best bet is to use the Saxon Java API. You can reuse your compiled stylesheet which will save a significant amount of time for each transformation. Cheers, -- Abel
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|