[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: would like to simplify my XSLT
David Carlisle wrote:
but it's rather more readable to say I think I need to practice it a little as soon as I have a use case, to see it in action, so I can *really* understand its use ;) That woudl get very confusing, especially for text nodes (which many Michael Kay wrote: You may have noticed that there are example user-written functions to dohmm, imo, (d) could've been taken from the description of deep-equal, which defines such equality. But I agree to both that for clarity there must be a difference between identity equality and value-equality (though clarity was my original reason for broadening the intersect parameter types). Btw, I find myself often encountering the situation where I have an operation on a sequence of strings and I first have to promote them to text nodes (I usually don't, I just end up using a for-in-return loop). I'll have a look at them to see if that can be done more easily using simpler xpath operators that I often overlook, like David suggests. Thanks, -- Abel
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|