[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Merging 2 XML's in to 1 output XML (Performance I
Kusunam, Srinivas wrote:
Mike, SAXON did improve the performance more than 10 times comparing to XALAN. I wonder why people are still using XALAN. Are there any specific areas where XALAN performs better than SAXON?? I use Xalan because I have found bugs in Saxon that Dr. Kay has told me he will not fix, and I do not feel comfortable working on that code base myself. Xalan is a supported and maintained product. All the bugs I have found in Xalan have been fixed, and I am confident that any I find in the future will also be fixed. For me, a correct, reliable implementation trumps speed. -- o;?Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|