[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Performance

Subject: Performance
From: "Khorasani, Houman" <houman_khorasani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:38:47 +0100
 Performance
I just have noticed

This way of writing the code is much faster

count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber')][@action='add'])

than this way:

count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber') and @action='add'])


Why is that?


And how do I write this piece of code like the above in the 'faster'
way?

count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber') and (@action='default' or
@action='add')])


Because this would imply I had two 'and' instead of one 'and' and one
'or' correct?

count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber')][@action='default'][@action
='add'])


Regards
Houman

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.