[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [exslt] Re: Re: Importing compiled styleshee

Subject: Re: [exslt] Re: Re: Importing compiled stylesheets
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
xml digsig
--- James Fuller <jim.fuller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >This would give the impression that only a single compiled stylesheet
> is 
> >referenced. In fact the included stylesheet may and often would include
> 
> >other compiled stylesheets, therefore I think that:
> >
> >  <exslt:include-compiled-module href="hrefToCompiledStylesheet"/>
> >
> >is slightly more precise in meaning.
> >
> >  
> >
> +1, though this raises a few questions, look below
> 
...............
> >
> >The intended use of the new extension element is not only to boost 
> >performance, but also to make possible to deploy *libraries* of 
> >xsl:function -s in a single module compiled module. Because the module
> is 
> >compiled, it would be possible to hide the source code and to protect
> the 
> >intellectual property of the developers.
> >  
> >
> yes, and this opens up other issues (admittedly a wider scope then
> applicable to current disc)....such as packaging with such deployment
> reuse structures...is there any XML digsig component of what we are
> discussing?  I think a bit of research is required to review some
> existing packaging efforts with XML, did this about a year ago, there
> are some interesting things happening with respect to compound xml
> documents, archives, packaged components

As Mike Kay rightfully pointed, we have an already developed spec for
modules in XQuery:

   http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/#id-query-prolog

and it would be wise to stick to it thus reusing the thought and
experience of the WG and also assuring that implementing
exslt:include-compiled-module will not require any significant effort from
vendours, who also implement XQuery.

> 
> should a compiled module come along with any meta data that maybe
> introspected (version, author, etc)

The XQuery spec provides just the metadata (variable types and function
signatures), necessary for linking modules.

> 
> is there any XML DigSig relevence with respect to protection,
> checksum...
> 
> any alignment with popular deployment package formats e.g. war/jar/ear
> 
> etc, etc...

I think as a first step we should concentrate on just a XQuery like
compiled module. Adding additional metadata and compression could follow
as next steps.

Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev



		
__________________________________ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/online.html

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.