[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Anybody know when "transform" became the term for
> We use the term "transform" around here when refering to XSLT > documents, > as in 'he is working on a transform for xxx'. Once some non-technical people I worked with referred to them as 'xsl scripts' which was awful and something I had to put right. But calling them stylesheets is just as bad as it conjures up images of a lightweight language that is a second class citizen. It's frustrating because there is no styling involved whatsoever. Maybe some sculpting, shaping or constructing, but no styling. Maybe it's because x-s-l-t doesn't exactly roll off the tongue and 'stylesheet' is simply easier to say... Maybe had the acronym been XTL or TLX (or any other combination of the 3) we would all laugh at the suggestion of calling our art 'stylesheets'.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|