[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Measuring the complexity of XSLT stylesheets
I would suggest that this won't give you any meaningful results. The
complexity of an XSLT transformation is driven by the
structural/formatting differences between the input and the output
formats. It is not directly related to the complexity of the schemata for
the input/output formats.
The complexity of an XSLT transformation is also driven by the number of ID/IDREF "joins" that are required. So XTM scores badly on that ground, as does XBRL for a similar reason (it uses XLink to impose all structure). However, that doesn't tell you about complexity, it rather tells you about which vocabularies are nearer to XSLT's "sweet spot", and which are not. Cheers, Tony. On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:56:02 +0100, Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I'm writing a paper where I'm evaluating different XML vocabularies for expressing the same information, and one of my evaluation criteria is how easily the resulting XML can be processed with XSLT. At the moment the paper contains only prose with a subjective appraisal of the various approaches. This is fine, as far as it goes, but it would be nice to have something more objective to back it up with. Are there any established criteria for evaluating the complexity of XSLT stylesheets?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|