[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Disable output-escaping
At 12:56 PM 1/25/2005, you wrote:
Wendell> A reason it is optional is that serializers are optional, Wendell> and if an implementor builds an engine with no Wendell> expectation that the result tree will be written out to a Wendell> file, how is it to be handled? It's a good question. I'm sure someone from the committee will be along shortly, though I have to admit that if you're not implementing a serializer, character maps would seem gratuitous. The spec does explicitly call in the XSLT and XQuery Serialization spec when discussing them. From the bleachers, it appears that (a) the intention may be that we use character maps for most or all the evil things we sometimes do with d-o-e in XSLT 1.0, and that (b) d-o-e's deprecation may have something to do with the fact that, as the spec notes [XSLT 2.0 20.2], "This feature requires an extension to the serializer described in [XSLT and XQuery Serialization]"; accordingly if you want your processor to support d-o-e, not just any conformant serializer will do. Cheers, Wendell
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|