[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Looking for a shorter mapping expression

Subject: Re: Looking for a shorter mapping expression
From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 01:50:14 -0700
m. david peterson
Dimitre,

took me a sec to realize you were refering to page 208 in his XPath
book...  I reread the XSLT 2.0 page 208 several times before I
realized "xpath expression = xpath book" :)  I'm with you now...

Are you refering to the fact an error is returned if E2 does not
return a sequence of nodes?  I guess that doesnt really make a lot of
sense given the above... but does this same rule apply when "/" is
used an an operand instead of a path expression?


On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 19:24:13 +1100, Dimtre Novatchev
<dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Because, according to the XPath 2.0 spec:
> 
> "only the last step in a path is allowed to return a sequence of atomic values."
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-path-expressions
> 
> Even the last E2 in a path expression should evaluate either to a
> sequence of nodes or a sequence of atomic values, but not a mixture of
> the two... I find this unreasonably restrictive and wonder why it was
> decided so.
> 
> Also, read page 208 of Mike's book.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dimitre.
> 
> On 05 Dec 2004 08:07:54 +0000, Colin Paul Adams
> 
> 
> <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>>> "Dimtre" == Dimtre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >    Dimtre> Hi, Could someone, please, suggest a more compact
> >    Dimtre> expression, equivalent to the value of the "select"
> >    Dimtre> attribute below:
> >
> >    Dimtre>       <xsl:sequence select= "for $this in $pList1 return
> >    Dimtre>                                     f:apply($pFun, $this)" />
> >
> >    Dimtre> It seems to me that this is illegal:
> >
> >    Dimtre>      $pList1/ f:apply($pFun, .)
> >
> >    Dimtre> because $pList1 in general may contain atomic items (not
> >    Dimtre> nodes).
> >
> > Why should that make it illegal? You have two primary expressions (a
> > variable reference and a function call) on either side of a /, so it
> > looks like a valid relative path expression to me.
> > --
> > Colin Paul Adams
> > Preston Lancashire
> 
> 


-- 
<M:D/>

:: M. David Peterson
:: XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.