Cart
|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Windows URLs
 P.S. Does anyone think I ought to allow windows path names in places where the spec requires a URI? I'm disinclined to do it, but it does give people a problem moving to a product that enforces the rules strictly from one that doesn't. The RXP parser allows Windows path names, but utters an imprecation (in the form of a warning message) when it does so. This seems like a reasonable compromise, though it's impossible to get this right (IMO) for every situation. In general, however, I find that URIs internal to a stylesheet are not a problem, since (namespace declarations aside, as they don't count) they are almost always relative paths. Where I really miss consistency in handling "file:" URIs is in parsers that must resolve DOCTYPE declarations or the equivalent(s) for schemas, where sometimes you want an absolute path. Cheers, Wendell
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
