[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Parametrized includes -work-around?
David,
David Carlisle wrote: Doing a two-step transformation seems easier at this points. We consider doing the first part (constructing the stylesheet that performs the actual transformation) as part of the strutscx action. My mistake, I misled you there. My point is this: we're going to have more than one dynamic include, i.e. the main stylesheet B would need to include, say, two more templates (C and D) dynamically (in addition to A which is always included as a module). Following your suggestions, we would write a strutscx action that combines C and D, then include B (and A). 'The XSLT way'. But I fail to to see the difference to doing it this way: write a strutscx action that takes B (and A), and inserts C and D. Does the same thing, only maybe not the 'XSLT way'. Actually, is there a written requirement that states how dynamic includes should be handled the XSLT way? Cheers, Ralph
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|