[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The real harm is in functions with side effects (W

Subject: Re: The real harm is in functions with side effects (Was: Re: Using Extension Functions - Its Efficiency)
From: "Mike Haarman" <mhaarman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:29:25 -0600
Re:  The real harm is in functions with side effects (W
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
news:0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E52BA807D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Well, doing so partially defeats the purpose of using XSLT, since it
> > means your stylesheets will not work in many other systems.  It begs
the
> > question, if you find that Java is needed, then why use XSL at all?
Why
> > not just write the app in Java?

If one is already working in an infrastructure supporting
transformations, an extension can take advantage of working with a
parsed object and established (and possibly memory resident) stylesheets
and write just the code required to supply what is wanted.

> Portability is not the main issue with using extension functions.
>

The portability of the message is the significance of XML.  The
portability of stylesheets is often a secondary concern.  Local
processing of the message is often dependent on local requirements.

> In many cases an application is designed to work only within a certain
known
> platform/environment (e.g. intranet), which is not going to change.

While *not going to change* is a forceful and often mistaken assumption,
there are obvious examples within a discrete application.  Outward
facing stylesheets prefer portability, inward facing ones, such as those
intended to improve data-hiding and encapsulation, usually have a
controlled execution environment.

> We need to have a special section in the XSLT FAQ about extension
functions
> and why functions with side effects are generally harmful in a
functional
> language.

Dimitre, could you refer us to a general discussion or monograph which
illustrates the problems for functional languages, not specific to XSLT.
I understand that the absence of side effects is a design goal for
functional languages.  Beyond provability and state reliability, are
there any other challenges?   A better understanding of the danger
allows for an improved assessment of risk.

Mike



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.