[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSL-FO versus PostScript
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:30:15AM -0500, Joseph Kesselman wrote: > Just a quick observation: If you really prefer to think in terms of > generating TeX rather than XSL-FO, IBM published a technology > demonstration quite some time ago which consisted of a XML equivalent > syntax for LaTeX and a postprocessor that would convert this into standard > LaTeX markup. It might still be available from the alphaWorks website. Please ignore my last reply to this - I wasn't aware that TeXML was a target and not a source. Sorry about that. Be well, Zack > > ______________________________________ > Joe Kesselman, IBM Next-Generation Web Technologies: > XML, XSL and more. "may'ron DaroQbe'chugh vaj bIrIQbej" > ("Put down the squeezebox and nobody gets hurt.") > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > -- Zack Brown XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|