RE: serialization question

Hi Agnes and Oleg.
Ssi are comments (<!-- --> pairs) and are treated like comments by xml
parsers (that is what is called when you set output method="xml"), ssi
only have special meaning to html parsers (not all parsers, but those
that suport server side), asp parsers and alike.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oleg
Tkachenko
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:11 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  serialization question


Agnes Kielen wrote:

> I''ve created a stylesheet for a html-page with Server Side Includes.
> Statements like: #include file="ssi/header.ssi" are transformed into:
> .
>
> I tried my output file at the server and found some strange thing.
> When I created the file with  the server did not inclued ssi-files,
> but when the transformation was done with  there was no problem. My
> files were included was as expected. Can anybody explain the reason
> for this.

I guess mime types may have something to do with it. Chances are your
server
is smart enough and is not trying to process ssi in xml documents. But
if you
are producing html pages with ssi why do you want to set xml output
method?

--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list