[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: generalized unique element
tried doing something like.. <xsl:if test="not(name(.) = preceding::node()/name())"> the / operator has to have path expressions not functions that return a string, like name(). You want the second name() to be like te first, taking the node as argument. name(preceding::node()) unfortunately you then can't use the magic property of = to test all elements of a node set, so you then need to use a predicate,something like <xsl:variable name="n" select="name(.)"/> <xsl:if test="preceding::*[name(.)=$n]"> You mentioned though the "Meunchian method" which does the same using keys which will be quicker on large data sets David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|